SpaceX Faces a Three-Key Approval Maze and a $40 Billion Financing Test at the Same Time

Two very different kinds of risk are converging on SpaceX right now — and investors would be wise to keep them apart. One is procedural: a potential combination with Tesla that still needs three separate sign-offs. The other is financial: a planned $40 billion AI funding package that is running into a wall of credit-market turbulence and rising borrowing costs.

Start with the merger question, because it is the one most likely to be mistaken for progress. According to a mandatory disclosure reported by Reuters, any combination with Tesla would require approval from a special committee, the board of directors, and controlling shareholder Elon Musk. That committee has not yet reached a decision on a deal. Musk had already said on Tuesday that both companies had formed special committees of independent board members, but no terms and no certain closing had been agreed.

The distinction matters. A well-ordered process can be a necessary precondition for a sound decision, but it is not a substitute for asking what a combination would actually deliver for SpaceX. The approval hurdles are neither an argument against a transaction nor a seal of quality for one. Nor does Musk's role as controlling shareholder tell us how the special committee will rule — treating the mere creation of these bodies as economic progress confuses preparation with value creation.

Strong Quarter Shifts the Burden of Proof

SpaceX's own numbers raise the bar for any deal. Reuters reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of $14.58 billion, up 161% year over year, with results beating analyst expectations. Net income reached $4.4 billion, a swing from a $1.1 billion loss in the prior-year period. AI revenue came in at $7.56 billion.

Those figures argue for judging SpaceX on its standalone performance. A merger should not win support simply because it promises a grander corporate story; it would have to show a demonstrable incremental benefit over going it alone. Strong growth is no license for every strategic expansion — good quarterly results and sensible merger terms are separate tests, and investors should resist folding both into a single growth narrative.

Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying SpaceX?

The Financing Side Tells a Different Story

Where demand is not the problem, funding is. Bloomberg reported yesterday that obstacles have emerged in the planned $40 billion AI financing, with credit-market volatility and higher financing costs complicating talks. That is the counterweight to growth euphoria: it is not only demand for computing power that counts, but the price of capital needed to build it.

Under the structure, a special-purpose vehicle would finance Nvidia chips and keep the funding off SpaceX's balance sheet. Goldman Sachs is in talks with investors including Apollo, Atlas SP would manage the vehicle, and Pimco is weighing a stake. This remains a project under negotiation, not a secured source of funds — an elaborate structure does not by itself create economic viability. What ultimately counts is whether the assets it buys earn enough, and how sensitive the math is to shifting credit conditions.

Earlier talks had contemplated yields in the mid-8% range for the subordinated tranche; pricing negotiations are now being reopened given market conditions. SpaceX also carries roughly $13 billion in debt booked after a failed sale-and-leaseback treatment. None of this proves the new financing will fail, but it is a good reason not to confuse balance-sheet engineering with a vanished funding need.

Capex Ambitions Meet Capital-Market Reality

The scale of the plan explains why the financing headline is more than a technical footnote. SpaceX expects fourth-quarter capital expenditure of $35–40 billion and has guided to first-quarter 2027 revenue of $33–37 billion — expectations, not achieved results. The company wants to build capacity fast while projecting sharply rising revenue, so the economics depend on expansion and customer demand arriving in step.

The operating base is substantial: in the third quarter of 2026, the Superintelligence segment posted $7.56 billion in revenue and $431 million in operating profit, so the AI business already contributes to earnings. Even so, extrapolating today's demand in a straight line would be premature. Higher financing costs weigh on the investment case, possible falling rental prices for computing power would be another headwind, and power and cooling bottlenecks could delay the buildout. Growth alone does not answer the question of sustainable returns.

Starlink Mobile Adds Opportunity — and a Bill

A further option surfaced on Thursday. Reuters, citing Bloomberg and people familiar with the matter, reported talks with mobile infrastructure companies to secure access to at least 80,000 US sites for a possible nationwide network, including discussions with Crown Castle. The goal is a satellite-and-ground network for Starlink Mobile. No agreement has been announced. TD Cowen estimates a nationwide terrestrial network at more than $80 billion and several years of construction — not a confirmed SpaceX spending plan, but a reminder that the wireless ambitions are not purely an extra revenue opportunity. Building a terrestrial network could create substantial additional capital needs alongside the AI business; a contract to use an existing network could reduce the required full buildout.

Weighing it all, the operating momentum is more convincing than the idea of a smooth expansion path. SpaceX is opening attractive business opportunities, but it must finance and execute their buildout. The next test is not simply "more revenue" but viable funding and durable returns on the capital invested. While the large chip financing is being renegotiated, that question deserves priority over ever-larger growth visions — and the three merger approvals remain a useful filter for investors, not an inconvenience.

Ad

SpaceX Stock: New Analysis - 24 October

Fresh SpaceX information released. What's the impact for investors? Our latest independent report examines recent figures and market trends.

Read our updated SpaceX analysis...